30th Anniversary Roe v Wade Service

Assembled for the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice

By Rev. Mark Stringer

First Unitarian Church of Des Moines

1/12/03

 

 

Reading         “Women Know”
(adapted from The Hope Clinic for Women Ltd.)

 

 

We women know when it is or is not the right time to bring a child into the world.

 

We use our heads and our hearts to see clearly the pros and cons of our three choices: parenting, placing for adoption, or having an abortion.

 

We know better than anyone else what we can and cannot handle emotionally, physically, financially, and mentally.

 

We have wisdom enough to know our own limits and strength enough to admit them.

 

We act out of compassion when we wait to have a child until the time when we can give it the kind of life every child deserves.

 

We act out of love when we consider what we would be taking away from the child or children we already have if we brought another child into our family now.

 

We take care of our spiritual well-being each in our own way, trusting our faith to provide: Infinite Love, Complete Understanding, and Boundless Compassion

 

Women throughout all time and throughout the world have made the decision to have an abortion, whether or not abortion was safe and legal.  Women have risked their own lives to avoid bearing a child they could not adequately care for.

 

Women in the past drank teas made from parts of plants known to cause abortion.  In desperation, some inserted long, thin objects into their cervix, and others douched with poisonous liquids to cause an abortion.  Some methods cost women their lives.

 

Childbirth, miscarriage, and abortion are all part of women’s lives.  Women of childbearing age from every generation, occupation, income level, race and religion have had abortions, including great-grandmothers, grandmothers, mothers, great-aunts and aunts, sisters, daughters, best friends, teachers, ministers, doctors, and daycare workers.

 

And when others use TV commercials, billboards, bumper stickers, speeches, and sermons to make us feel guilty about having an abortion.

 

We women know the truth:  That given certain circumstances abortion is the most morally responsible and loving choice we can make.

 

 

Sermon

 

As I begin my remarks today, I must confess something to you.  I am 35 years old, which means I have never known an America where women did not have the right to legal and safe abortions.  Perhaps this is why I have often thought to myself that the Roe v. Wade decision would never be in danger of being overturned.  I simply have not been able to imagine an America where women would not have the right to choose.  You may think I am naïve…and you are probably right.  Certainly after researching for this sermon and being forced to read some of the writing on the wall, I’m beginning to see that I probably have been naïve…or at least painfully unappreciative of the battles that have been fought not only to bring us to the Roe v. Wade decision, but to protect the reproductive rights that the landmark ruling established. So today, I want to share with you some of what I have learned and why I have begun to change my perspective on my responsibility to do my part to insure that a woman’s right to choose her own reproductive fate should never be denied.

 

When I was asked to offer a sermon for this service, I knew that I had to say, “yes.”  I had to say “yes” because soon after I began serving as the minister of this church, about 18 months ago, I discovered that I had become the minister of a church that historically had been a real thorn in the side of the Des Moines anti-choice movement.   I knew this not because the members had told me, or because I had researched it.  Sure, I could have guessed that this would be the case, since Unitarian Universalism is a religious movement devoted to protecting the inherent worth and dignity of all individuals and to advancing freedom of belief, and all of the UU churches I have attended have had members who have done their part to see that the reproductive rights of women are protected. But, I didn’t have to guess.  l learned of the pro-choice history of this church…and many of you from other faith traditions gathered with us today …because one of the people who has worked to eliminate reproductive choice in this town told me about it. 

 

This woman actually came to my installation service here just over a year ago.  She sat in one of these very seats and sheepishly looked around, seeing faces that she recognized from the trenches of the abortion battle.  Why had she come?  Well, this woman who had done more than her share of working to eliminate reproductive choice, this kind, bubbly woman, was my wife’s aunt. She came to support her niece and nephew, and I really respect her for coming. After the service, she reflected about how the persistent effort by those in the pro-choice movement had ultimately worn her out.  A staunchly conservative Catholic, she felt that her faith called her to take a stand against what she and others in the anti-choice movement call “the right to kill an unborn child.”  More than just her religious faith compelled her to fight against choice, though.  You see, she and her husband are adoptive parents who love their adopted daughter as their own.  To imagine that this child, now a successful young woman, could have been aborted was and no doubt still is a troubling thought that sparked her long-fought battle against abortion.

 

But at every turn in her crusade, she and her anti-choice companions have been met by people who would not be deterred in their efforts to see that a woman’s right to reproductive choice was protected.  Some of these battles were fought by people here in this room.  Some were fought by people no longer with us. 

 

So as we are together today to acknowledge the 30 year anniversary of Roe v. Wade, I am proud to have the opportunity to carry on the legacy a full generation in the making…a legacy crafted not only by the people in this church, but by all the people of faith in Des Moines who have done their part to defend the right that each woman in this country has to secure a safe and legal abortion.

 

For without this persistent effort…without vigilance in conveying the real facts of the matter, the people working so hard to eliminate reproductive choice--people like my wife’s aunt, people like some of our elected officials and governmental appointees, people who are driven by what believe are noble, faith-inspired, conscientious instincts--might have been more successful.  They might have deterred more women from making their own reproductive choices.  They might have been able to impose their own religious ideologies on people of all faiths and to restrict a woman’s right to choose what happens to her own body.

 

So what are the facts of the matter?

 

The movement to legalize abortion came about not as a careless whim eventually okayed by bloodthirsty justices of the supreme court.  It was, simply put, a compassionate attempt to help prevent botched abortions.  A few statistics I uncovered this week:

--In 1965 illegal abortion led to an estimated 5,000 deaths a year and over half of those who died were women of color. 

--Now, of the 1.6 million abortions performed in the US each year, only 6 result in the mother’s death. 

--You may find it interesting to note that in Mexico, where abortion is illegal--yet performed at the rate of 1.5 million times a year--140,000 women die each year from botched abortions.

 

There are some in the anti-choice movement who oppose the Roe v Wade decision because, they say, it made it possible for women to choose abortion at any time.  But this myth of “abortion on demand” has little to do with the decision as it was articulated in 1973.

 

Roe v. Wade was actually a compromise ruling, adopted by a 7 to 2 majority of a conservative court.  The decision said:

--states may not regulate abortion in the first trimester

--states may regulate abortion in the second trimester only to safeguard women’s health; and

--states may regulate abortion in the third trimester to protect a viable fetus, except when the woman’s life or health is in danger.

 

Roe v Wade, therefore, did not establish abortion on demand, as though women could then decide to have an abortion at any time in their pregnancy.  In fact, the Roe decision made it more likely that women having abortions would do so earlier in their pregnancies.  In 1973, only 38% of abortions were performed at or before eight weeks of pregnancy.  Today, 91% are performed during the first 12 weeks and just over 96% take place during the first 15 weeks. 

 

Opponents of Roe v. Wade also contend that religion and the Bible oppose abortion.  At the risk of making an all too obvious point in a world where religious extremists throughout time have been inflicting violence on those who view matters of faith differently than they do, we don’t all hold the same religious beliefs.  Followers of the Jewish faith, to name just one example, are explicitly taught that life begins at the moment of birth…not before.  Therefore, in cases where a mother’s life is in danger, termination of her pregnancy is not merely permitted, but required.  Clearly Jews should not be held accountable to others’ religious dogma.  In fact, to do so would be to go against the teachings of their own faith.  

 

But even if we could assume for a moment that we all adhere to the Bible as the one true source of divine revelation, there is no certainty that we would see eye to eye.  For while people will often quote the Bible as though its authors speak with clarity and assurance, this is simply not the case in many matters, including abortion.  Bible passages can be interpreted numerous ways, especially on complex moral issues.  In fact, some of the same passages quoted by the anti-choice movement could be interpreted by those in this room as proof that God would want abortion to be a safe and legal option for women. Of course, people are free to interpret scripture as they see fit. And I would not want to contend that my or anyone else’s personal take on the mystery and origins of our shared existence is any more valid than the next person’s.  But I always reserve the right to protest whenever I believe people are being forced to accept one group’s interpretations of an ancient text as unequivocal truths. 

 

Of course, the descriptor “pro-choice” is an affront to many people who oppose abortion.  What choice does the aborted fetus have, they ask?  Why do you use “choice” when you should be calling yourselves “pro-abortion.”

 

Let’s get real.  I contend that there are few in this country…if any…who are truly pro-abortion.  Furthermore, I find it difficult to believe that any woman, faced with an unwanted or untimely pregnancy, would consider having an abortion with joy.  Of all the women I have known who have had abortions, I can safely say that none of them relished the idea. It was a difficult choice made at a difficult time.  Indeed, abortions often, if not always, are accompanied by feelings of grief and loss…and sometimes even shame. 

 

Frankly, I am troubled by the title “pro-life” for those who oppose choice…as though the decision that a woman who is considering abortion faces is simply for life or against life…in other words, for life or for death.  But let’s be clear about this. A woman deciding whether or not to end a pregnancy is making a choice between life and life.

Her choice is against potential life or against existing life.  There are no easy answers in these circumstances and no completely good choice to be made.  No woman would ever desire to be faced with this choice, yet the choice is one faced by millions each year.

 

That’s why I think the discussion should not really be about women seeking abortion, as if it is a procedure that women desire.  This discussion should be about freedom:  Freedom for women to follow their own inherent moral conscience and to make tough decisions in difficult circumstances; Freedom for women to have access to safe and legal medical care; Freedom for women to disregard the easy answers of people who wish to impose their biases as law and to belittle the struggles that every woman who has ever considered abortion must face.  Freedom.

 

Now freedom is a word we hear a lot these days.  Curious that we should be hearing the word freedom so much when there seem to be so many threats to our freedom all around us.   Some examples:

--The Patriot Act threatening our civil liberties. 

--An attorney general who, it would seem, prefers a police state to the democratic justice system he has been entrusted to defend.

--A House and Senate controlled by members of the Republican party, a party which, despite the fact that a majority of Americans favor some form of choice for women, has had anti-choice policies in its platform since 1980.

--A number of seats on the Supreme Court soon to be vacated and likely to be filled with justices who may seek to restrict a woman’s right to choose. 

--The recent appointments of opponents to reproductive choice to positions in the federal government that do not require public hearings or even disclosure.  One example is the pending appointment of anti-choice gynecologist W. David Hager to a Food and Drug Administration panel that oversees reproductive health medicines.  Hager reportedly refuses to provide contraceptives to unmarried women, opposes emergency contraception, and described recommendations to use condoms for disease prevention as “almost malpractice.” 

Certainly, there are dark clouds looming over all of us who believe that a woman’s right to freely choose what happens to her own body is far more important than the political and religious ideology of a bunch of mostly white men and the people who blindly trust them.  But those dark clouds do not have to be permanent fixtures in our lives.  Each of us does have a chance, and I contend, a responsibility to work for and protect the reproductive freedom that so many of us have come to take for granted.  Each of us has the chance, if not the responsibility, to do our best to clear the skies of these clouds and to keep them clear for those who will follow.

 

A great place to begin would be for us to continue efforts to educate those of my generation and younger who do not know what it is like to live during a time when abortion is illegal.  We haven’t seen what it is like to have to travel out-of-state, or worse, to have to sneak around to find renegades willing to break the law in often times less than safe and or sanitary conditions.  We don’t have the memory of when coat hangers were the closest thing to medical tools for some desperate women.   And we don’t have the memory of the tragedy of botched abortions or the medical after-effects of illegal abortions. 

 

My generation needs to hear the stories of people who know what it is like to live in a country where a woman’s right to choose is restricted.   We need to hear the perspectives like the one shared by a doctor who has performed abortions, who said,  “I respect these people who have picketed outside my office for 25 years, in and out of snowstorms.  Obviously they believe in what they are doing and are very persistent.  At the same time, I have taken care of many of their wives and children and even some of the people on the picket line who suddenly find themselves in a very different situation than they ever thought possible….I know what would happen if these picketers outside my office were successful politically—a lot more tragedy, a lot more deaths.  I saw what it was like when it was illegal.  Look—we have saved tens of thousands of lives, maybe hundreds of thousands.”

 

We need to keep reminding all of the anti-choice crusaders out there that as long as there have been pregnancies, there have been abortions, and that regardless of the restrictions placed on a woman’s reproductive rights, there will continue to be abortions.  The question that we should all be asking then, is do we want these women…
these women who are our mothers and sisters and daughters, our neighbors and co-workers and friends…
do we want these women who, after all, are always in the best position to know when it is or is not the right time to bring a child into the world…
do we want these women to be forced to have unsafe, illegal, back alley abortions, and risk infection, infertility and even death?   History has shown that when women are denied other alternatives, they will take those risks.  Or are we going to make sure that if women see no alternative to abortion, they can at least have access to clean, safe, and legal abortions?

 

The choice, at least for the time being, is ours…may we defend the right to keep that choice ours.

 

We can help to ensure choice by working to increase access to family planning, and by supporting responsible sexuality education, prenatal care, and legal abortion.  After all, don’t we all believe that every child should be a wanted child?

 

Today we acknowledge and celebrate a generation of faithful reproductive choices, choices made possible by the Roe v Wade decision, choices that are the right of every woman.  May we do all we can to insure that the next generation has these same choices.  May we do all we can to, “keep abortion safe and legal, and pray that no one we love ever needs one.”

 

 

Facts gathered from sources provided by the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice.  For more information visit their website at www.rcrc.org.